An Examination of Orthodontic Awareness and Treatment Perceptions among Tribal in Relation to Malocclusion Prevalence

Abstract

Background: The study uncovers a notable disparity between orthodontic awareness and the perceived necessity for treatment. While a substantial proportion of individuals are informed about orthodontic options, a smaller percentage acknowledges the need for treatment despite the prevalent occurrence of malocclusion. Factors such as cultural attitudes towards dental aesthetics, personal priorities, and economic constraints may contribute to this disconnect. The findings highlight the importance of not only increasing awareness about orthodontics but also addressing the factors influencing the perception of treatment necessity. Educational programs and public health initiatives should focus on bridging this gap, with tailored interventions that address both informational and perceptual barriers. Addressing orthodontic care in tribal populations requires a multifaceted approach that improves awareness and adjusts perceptions of treatment necessity. By implementing targeted educational programs and overcoming cultural and economic barriers, it is possible to enhance the utilization of orthodontic services and improve overall dental health outcomes in these communities.

Aim: This study investigates the levels of orthodontic awareness, the perceived needs for treatment, and the prevalence of malocclusion among tribal populations. By correlating these aspects, the study aims to understand how awareness and perceived needs align with the actual prevalence of malocclusion in these communities.

Material and Method: This study employs a cross-sectional design to evaluate orthodontic awareness and perceived needs for treatment among distinct tribal populations carried out in the department of orthopedics. This study contains the total 200 tribal population. The occlusion of the students was assessed and classified into the categories of ideal occlusion and Angle’s Class I, II & III malocclusions. Furthermore, with esthetic perceptions driven by a communal phenotype in these endogamous populations, it was expected to mainly come across borderline derangements of occlusion with a higher percentage of ideal occlusion and Angle’s class I Malocclusion. In such a scenario and in the absence of periodontal disease or gross decay, it would require keen interest or a degree of poor self-esteem to solicit orthodontic treatment.

Results:A larger proportion of males have malocclusion compared to females. Among those with malocclusion, the majority fall into Angle’s Class I, with a significant number also classified as Angle’s Class II, particularly among males. Angle’s Class III is relatively less common but still shows some gender disparity in prevalence. The Bimaxillary protrusion is the most prevalent condition among the population, affecting 68%. Midline diastema is the least prevalent, affecting only 10% of the